A Discussion of City by the Sea

I have often wondered if a good reviewer should include bias and favoritism or not. In my early college classes my papers were graded on technical elements, not content. If I used proper language, structure, and any other of the arbitrary rulings my paper could be about the accumulation of bird poop on sidewalks. I have wondered, should I treat movies this way? If a movie is full of good actors and directing should I rate it higher even if I didn’t like it? These are questions I must ask while I review City by the Sea.

I picked this movie up because I found it cheap and it boasted Robert DeNiro and James Franco. On the back the blurb describes this as a story about a cop who has to track down his own son as a suspect in a murder case. I completely missed the part about this being “based on true events” for which I’m glad. It wasn’t until I watched the movie that I realized it also featured Frances McDormand and Eliza Dushku, both of whom are fantastic and made me anticipate the movie even more.

The problem is, I just couldn’t get into the film. McDormand is wasted here, her limited screen time really hurts her character, giving us no reason to not dislike her. Dushku is lazily introduced and underused, and an important plot point for her character was introduced in the same fashion. Robert DeNiro is fun to watch, and I’ll give him credit that he manages to pull off a stoic character who is forced to actually face his emotions. The problem is stoic character can become boring, the emotional investment just wasn’t there.

This movie bounces back and forth between DeNiro and Franco, an emotionless father and a druggie son. People enter their lives and swirl about only to drift away. Part of the problem lies in the fact that going in we know it’s the story of father and son; I really feel that this plot point could have really created an emotional impact had we not known beforehand. I also feel that McDormand and Dushku should have been pushed to the front, make the movie more of an ensemble cast.

If we could have seen Dushku as a recovering junkie trying to provide for her son we might have cared when she was on screen, and as such we might have cared about the fate of Franco since he is her boyfriend. Likewise with McDormand, she feels that DeNiro’s character is emotionally distant, but does not react well when he reaches out to her. I felt nothing but annoyance at this because we have not been given a reason to care about her.

All of this is very tragic, because the movie does feature great actors and some fine performances. It was shot well, with effective location shoots and accompanying music. The pieces are all here, this should add up to a great movie, but as it is it’s very, very average.

City by the Sea gets 2/5.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “A Discussion of City by the Sea

  1. The central paradox in reviewing, evaluation and critique is that creative works are comprised of discrete elements that can be objectively and empirically evaluated, as well as subjective elements that ultimately boil down to preference no matter how much a reviewer tries to tell us otherwise.

    When an english professor grades you on the technical details of a paper rather than the specific content, they are both focusing on insuring you can create a technically competant paper while discouraging the idea that sheer creativity will make up for anything. In this case, you do indeed need to crawl before you may walk.

    It can be surprising when a movie has all of the right pieces yet fails anyway; the video store is full of such titles with all-star casts, from the creators of award-winning films that basically came right to DVD.

    A movie like this suffers because it has to remain true, to some fractional degree, to its source. It’s a man’s story; the women are sidelined and relegated to minor characters at best. Poor judgment, perhaps, in not realizing the full potential of the whole story.

  2. Thus the lesson we learn is this: More Eliza Dushku = better movie.

    This movie really is a shame, it could have been much better. I was really dissipointed after watching it, and it doesn’t even get the facts right.

    Oh well, new update coming later today.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s